Dennis talks with Matthew Vines, the author of the article, founder and executive director of the Reformation Project, and author of God and the Gay Christian. Matthew explains why he wrote the piece, arguing that “queer” can be offered as a neutral umbrella word and then arrive with a set of ideological expectations. They talk about queer theory and Foucault, and about why Matthew believes being gay should not require a particular worldview. He says plainly that he supports trans and bi people, and that his point is about freedom of thought, not division. As he puts it, “gay people should all have the freedom to think for ourselves.”
In this episode:
• Matthew’s evangelical Presbyterian upbringing and how he came to rethink his beliefs
• Why he wrote the article, and what happened after marriage equality
• Queer as an umbrella label versus an ideology
• A Christian view of power, norms, and marriage
• His hopes for the conversation
Links:
• Matthew Vines: matthewvines.com (https://matthewvines.com/)
• The Reformation Project: reformationproject.org (https://reformationproject.org/)
• The New York Times article (https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/30/opinion/queer-gay-rights.html) and Matthew’s follow-up on Substack (https://matthewvines.substack.com/p/why-i-wrote-about-gay-and-queer-for)
Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/churchandmain) | Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/churchandmainpod/) | Threads (https://www.threads.net/@churchandmainpod) | Website (https://churchandmain.org/) | YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/@churchmainpodcast) | Substack (https://churchandmain.substack.com/)
Enjoyed this episode? Subscribe to Church and Main on your favorite podcast app, leave a review, and visit churchandmain.org (https://churchandmain.org) or churchandmain.substack.com (https://churchandmain.substack.com) to read more and support the show. Send an email to dennis@churchandmain.org (mailto:dennis@churchandmain.org) .